Saturday, September 15, 2007
Looking for intellectual freedom? You'll have better luck with leprechauns.
Anyway, today, I found a very interesting article online, which was published in the Cornell Daily Sun which was published not long after I left Ithaca in 2004. The Daily Sun is generally a centrist newspaper (the Cornell Review and Cornell American are conservative, while the other twenty-five-plus student publications are liberal). The article, reproduced here on the website of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, is a response to a challenge to send in "concrete examples" of anti-conservative discrimination in academia. Amusingly, within two days of this challenge being issued, the Student Assembly attempted to defund the aforementioned Cornell American. This action was spearheaded by the Student Assembly vice-president, who also happened to be president of the Cornell Democrats. Hmm...conflict of interest much?
A few lines from the article tell us things we shouldn't be surprised by:
96.8 percent of presidential campaign contributions made by Cornell faculty went to John Kerry
To [Professor Arthur] Bellinzoni, the incarnation of evil is George W. Bush.
When Wells [College, Aurora, NY] Republicans last year published their study on the faculty's political makeup, Prof. Jonathan Vawter responded with a campus-wide e-mail labeling Republicans "stupid," and calling for "lobotomies" for all Republicans. Shortly thereafter, Wells' version of the SA denied the Wells Republicans' request for recognition as an official club, which would have qualified them for funding.However, the article also revealed some things that even I, your cynical and chronically jaded host, find shocking:
At Ithaca College, faced with the evidence that there was not a single Republican in the politics department she chaired, Prof. Asma Barlas boasted "we have a range of progressive views in our department." Apparently for Prof. Barlas, intellectual diversity means spanning the spectrum from liberal to Maoist.
In 1997, when some students took issue with articles in another conservative publication, The Cornell Review, they stole and burned hundreds of copies of the newspaper. The administration meted out no punishment for such blatant trampling of others' free speech. To the contrary, as former Sun columnist Joe Sabia has noted, the only official reaction was an attempt by the Student Assembly (notice a trend here?) "to defund the Review, ban it from campus, and send all of its editors to the Judicial Administrator for sensitivity training."
At Ithaca College, Time Magazine recently reported ("The Right's New Wing," Aug. 22, 2004) that "you don't have to spend much time at the college to see that liberals run the place. It posted a website after 9/11 devoted almost exclusively to critiques of the U.S. The site includes the text of a talk by Professor Asma Barlas, who chaired the politics department last year, in which she blames 'Jewish groups' for 'introducing modern forms of terrorism into the Middle East' and suggests that capitalism 'provided the breeding grounds for much of modern day extremism.'" When Time asked politics professor Charles Santiago whether he assigned conservative thinkers, "he responded, completely without irony, 'I am teaching Hitler.'"An exposition of blatant discrimination at the University of Miami and the University of Colorado at Boulder rounded out the article:
Until public outcry forced the university to back down, white students at the University of Colorado at Boulder were barred from taking the popular School and Society course on Fridays. The school had reserved that class period for "students of color" in order to provide "a much safer and open environment."
Former Clinton cabinet member Donna Shalala, now President of the University of Miami, permitted the denial of recognition of a new conservative student group on the theory that the College Republicans speak for all conservatives, despite the fact that Miami recognizes six liberal groups.All I can say is that I'm glad I'll be out of the academic world soon. Every time I hand an essay in these days, I feel like there's a club hovering over my head waiting to come down the moment someone shouts "CONSERVATIVE!".
So why not go after the more than 300 colleges in this country that are religiously affiliated and have strict fundamentalist beliefs written directly into their mission statements? That's ok, right? It's ok to be single-minded and one-sided as long as it's in the name of god.
Astrophysics failed to have a professor of Astrology for balance.
That said, I have no problem with religious schools, and here's why: people who choose to go to those schools know what they're choosing. If an atheist chooses to go to a Christian college, they (hopefully) realize their views are going to be attacked in class. If a conservative chooses to go to almost any major university in this country, they may not realize that the same is going to happen to them - but unfortunately, it will.
The fact is that it's been shown many times that universities in this country are enormously biased in favor of liberals among the faculty, and Cornell is one of the most imbalanced of all. Over 97% of political contributions from Cornell faculty members go to the Democratic Party. I know much less about Ithaca College, I will admit, so I trusted this Sun article (at least, as much as I ever trust the media).
BB: Amusing, but not a very good metaphor. I'm not claiming we need some sort of quota system for conservatives and liberals in academia; I'm dead set against affirmative action of any sort. However, bias in existing faculty and administration often translates to bias in hiring decisions and, even worse, in grading, and this is a huge problem which is largely ignored.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_D._Ehrman Likewise, if one prefers
their biology degree unfettered with evolutionary theory, they may attend here: http://creationwiki.org/Institute_for_Creation_Research ..and I suppose you are familiar with the
conservative Poly Sci Prof over at his blog http://burkeanreflections.blogspot.com/ ..? But, I agree, higher
education is a bastion of non-conservative politics, despite some representatives among the neo-con community like Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle. It is odd, but
most PhDs I know are subject-driven, with politics as sort of
a backround or secondary interest, albeit often liberal or progressive.
<< Home


